Are we missing anything?
Think of a concrete example of insufficient information exchange that you have experienced.
Where does the shoe pinch?
Look at your own day-to-day experience.
Use the five SACCIA competencies to identify concrete examples from your own communication with others.
Think about your day-to-day communication. Where does communication become difficult, frustrating or ineffective?
Work through all five competencies. Your examples may come from different situations.
Think of a concrete example of insufficient information exchange that you have experienced.
Think of a concrete example involving inaccurate information, inaccurate understanding, or insufficient interpersonal validation of what was said.
Think of a concrete example involving unclear, vague, ambiguous or imprecise messages — or uncertainty that was not addressed or resolved.
Think of a concrete example of a factor that made shared understanding more difficult — such as different goals, poor timing, time pressure, delayed communication, lack of privacy, difficult relationships, lack of trust or cultural differences.
Think of a concrete example of a situation in which communication was not sufficiently adapted to someone’s emotional, cognitive or linguistic needs.
Look back at the five situations you identified. Choose the one where a different approach could make the greatest difference.
Make it concrete enough that you could try it.
Create a one-page summary of the examples and next step you identified. Your entries stay in your browser and are not sent to EISCOM.
You have just recognised SACCIA in experiences that have already happened. Now see if you can notice one of the five competencies while you are still in the conversation.
Need a SACCIA refresher?
Explore the SACCIA framework and the five competencies,
or get in touch if you have questions.